Inconsistent Elongation figures on website

The technical datasheets for Elastic 50A and Flexible 80A list their post-cure Elongation at Failure as 160% and 120%, respectively.

The online material properties comparison graph shows Elastic 50A as merely 50%:

The comparison table in the Using Elastic 50A article lists Flexible 80A as 164%

While the same material is (presumably correctly) listed as 120% in a similar table under the Using Flexible 80A article.

Are the inconsistent values simply typos, and if so could we get them corrected? Thanks!

This topic was automatically closed 182 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.