Inconsistent Elongation figures on website

The technical datasheets for Elastic 50A and Flexible 80A list their post-cure Elongation at Failure as 160% and 120%, respectively.

The online material properties comparison graph shows Elastic 50A as merely 50%:

The comparison table in the Using Elastic 50A article lists Flexible 80A as 164%

While the same material is (presumably correctly) listed as 120% in a similar table under the Using Flexible 80A article.

Are the inconsistent values simply typos, and if so could we get them corrected? Thanks!